Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

If you are feeling extremely depressed and possibly even suicidal, please call or text 988 (suicide hotline) or any loved one who you believe is immediately available. If you feel depressed and in need of a friendly community and unbiased emotional support, you can email Alex and Marty at emotionalsupportgroup@all4consolaws.org

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

169 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

1. Legislative bodies and ex post facto laws

  • The Constitution (Article I, Section 9) says:

“No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.”

  • Blackstone’s principle:

“Where the law is fundamental and clear, it admits of no variance; no man, no court, can alter or evade it. To pretend to do so is tyranny.”

  • Implication: Any legislature that passes an ex post facto law, whether civil or criminal, is violating both:
  1. The explicit text of the Constitution
  2. The fundamental rule of law outlined by Blackstone
  • This is an act beyond their legitimate authority, and thus tyrannical in effect.

2. Judiciary and reinterpretation

  • Courts have sometimes allowed retroactive civil penalties by interpreting the Ex Post Facto Clause as only applying to criminal laws.
  • According to Blackstone:

Judges may interpret ambiguous statutes, but they cannot alter, evade, or create exceptions to clear fundamental law.

  • Implication: When the judiciary narrows or circumvents an explicit constitutional prohibition, such as excluding civil laws from the Ex Post Facto Clause, it is acting outside its authority.
  • By Blackstone’s standard, this is also tyrannical, because it substitutes judicial will for explicit constitutional law.

3. Combined effect

  • Any legislative body passing retroactive laws that punish past acts violates the Constitution and Blackstone’s principle.
  • Any judiciary that reinterprets the Constitution to allow such laws is complicit, acting beyond its constitutional role.
  • Ordinary people bear the consequences, while elites often escape, amplifying the injustice.

https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/16.0.1/svg/2705.svg Bottom line

  • Legislature: Passing any ex post facto law (civil or criminal) = ultra vires (beyond authority) + tyrannical.
  • Judiciary: Reinterpreting explicit constitutional language to allow retroactive penalties = ultra vires + tyrannical.
  • Blackstone’s principle: Fundamental law is non-negotiable, and both legislative and judicial overreach in this context constitutes a violation of the Constitution and tyranny.

If you want, I can create a diagram showing the flow of authority vs. overreach, mapping the Constitution, Blackstone’s rules, legislature, judiciary, and the ordinary citizen, so it’s visually undeniable how the system breaks down.

My petition was accepted a couple of years ago to my great relief.
I was allowed this due to the stoke of a legislative pen.
And the it occurred to me; I had been a registered citizen due to a great offense.
There were many others who had similarly offended, signed contracts to avoid registration and with a stroke of the legislative pen, those contracts were null and void and they were registered.
When is to prevent another stroke of a pen to undo my relief?

This really hit home –

According to Dr. Huffer, “legal abuse syndrome (LAS) is a form of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It is a psychic injury, not a mental illness. It is a personal injury that develops in individuals assaulted by ethical violations, legal abuses, betrayals, and fraud. Abuse of power and authority and a profound lack of accountability in our courts have become rampant.”

Post registration drama;
Once released from the duty to register after 21 years in California, I took a trip to Cabo, all legit. Upon my return my passport was revoked because it did not have the special unique identifier. Prior to my Cabo trip, I sent all documentation to the State department, Angel Watch, DHS, and DOJ. Still revoked. I applied for a new passport and included copies of all documentation again to the same agencies, got the passport back and it had the SO notification. I contacted DHS/ICE/Angel Watch since that’s their gig, they responded that day stating I should not have the notification and they notified the State Dept that I should not have that on my passport. I sent that information, all prior documentation and the new passport back with a very direct letter, got the new passport today and …NO NOTIFICATION!

Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 386 (1798) –

definition of “fraud upon the court”

based on the case of Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985).

  • Fraud upon the court is directed at the judicial machinery itself, not just fraud between parties.
  • It involves corruption or influence of the court or a member of the court.
  • It occurs when a judge has not performed their judicial function.
  • The impartial functions of the court must have been directly corrupted.

as in Smith v. Doe, 538 US 84 (2003)

Through all the waste, fraud, and abuse, it is apparent that these corrupt courts, for the most part, are choosing deliberate indifference to the facts!

We need emergency intervention/relief from the retaliatory, irreparable harm the government is inciting against us all!

LIVES ARE BEING LOST at alarming rates under this unconstitutional form of retroactive cruel and unusual punishment!

The government cannot deem legal activity to be illegal activity for SOME members of the public while equal protection of the laws forbids that!

That would make the government no better than, but equivalent to, the criminal who violates someone’s rights…

All (Civil and Criminal) Ex Post Facto laws are repugnant to the constitution!

The word “NO” is not vague!

In a court, there is no subject matter to operate on; it is a moot matter!

Any consideration on the matter is tyranny!

Forget Smith v. Doe… Calder V. Bull must go!

So sick of this sh*t already!

Justices! Stop circumventing the law! = Outlaws!

Just a warning for pfrs. Stay away from ICE protests. If you end up falsely arrested, you could be beaten and killed by ICE if found out you are a pfr. More than 20 have died in custody this year. One person who died had his feet and hands tied and was hanged while in custody – sounds like murder to me as how does one tie one’s own hands and feet and then hang oneself? It has also been reported that there are ICE employees with criminal records who normally would not be hired but are hired under the current regime. This is my PSA.

If you haven’t read about the Chicago man who set a random young woman on public transit on fire, I suggest you do so (it’s a major story, just search for it on-line). The alleged assailant has over 50 arrests, many felony and misdemeanor convictions, and his most recent arrest was just a few months ago–he attacked a female social worker in a hospital. When I hear about what PFRs in Illinois have to go through, especially people like Athena’s family member who appears to have a pretty minor conviction and yet is unable to find housing, it just makes my blood boil that the leadership of Chicago treats a man who is clearly unable to live peacefully among people better than someone whose only crime probably had to be detected by an algorithm (in other words, I’m guessing no one ever actually made a complaint about Athena’s son). It also shows the absolute useless of ankle monitors–this guy had one on when he burned this woman, it clearly did nothing to prevent him from acting out in a horrifically violent way against a stranger. It just baffles me that people who consider themselves “liberal” are willing to go out of their way for the most disturbing men in the country but consider other men with a single sex crime conviction to be undeserving of any basic human decency.

I wonder why SCOTUS doesn’t use real info –

https://www.appa-net.org/eweb/docs/appa/pubs/rml.pdf

Has anyone been aware of a potential case to keep an eye on if the Supreme Court agrees to hear it is United States v. Pheasant (No. 23-991 (9th Cir. 2025)  
 It doesn’t relate to the registry but to Nondelegation Doctrine and congress ability to delegate acts. 
 Don’t know if they will appeal since it affects potentially everyone I imagine that they will. 

The outcome

Law opinion

And
united states v pheasant oral argument held in important nondelegation challenge

Last northwestern.edu

A happy Thanksgiving to everyone!

I recently petitioned to get my gun rights restored here in Arizona. Typical response from the AG, was to list the few technical probation violations I had and nothing else. They then said it was ultimately up to the Court to restore my rights.
I will use People v. Thai as my rebuttal as the AG failed to show that I am a current danger to the community because everything they listed was from more than 14 years ago.

If you watch any of the Institute for Justice videos related to LE, one can come away with two conclusions – never call LE for help as you will most likely be arrested, and two, most LE are idiots and/or terrorists who do not comply with the constitution.

As a pfr who has had LE threaten to physically harm my minor aged children and who threatened to arrest me on false charges (and later followed through and had a false arrest warrant issued where a judge later learned the truth and nothing happened to me) and who has had local cops break into my house, vandalize it and steal multiple items with my DNA on it to plant it in a park per rumors to get my deferred adjudication revoked, I do not trust LE, and neither should you.

I believe LE should only have qualified immunity if complying with the statutes and the constitution. If LE violates a statute and/or the constitution while doing his/her job, then there should be no qualified immunity for the actions that resulted in the violation of the statute and/or constitution. In that case, the LE agency, the state, city or county overseeing the LE agency and the LEO personally should be monetarily liable.